| Home > Research > Environmental & Aquatic Animal Health > Research Programs & Projects |
Programs
|
Department of Environmental & Aquatic Animal Health - Research Projects Elizabeth River Tributyltin Monitoring ProgramLink to:
|
| (a) | shall not bear such compounds on their hulls or external parts or surfaces; or |
| (b) | shall bear a coating that forms a barrier to such compounds leaching from the underlying non-compliant anti-fouling systems. |
This applies to all ships (including fixed and floating platforms, floating storage units (FSUs), and Floating Production Storage and Offtake units (FPSOs).
To assess the effectiveness of TBT regulations, the Department of Environmental & Aquatic Animal Health at VIMS began analyzing water samples and biota from various locations around southern Chesapeake Bay. Water column monitoring has continued at nine stations near marina areas every month since 1985 and the resulting data set has shown elevated TBT concentrations in the vicinity of marinas and has documented the variability in spatial and temporal trends. Concentrations have decreased by at least a factor of five at the marina monitoring stations in the last ten years but are still above detection limits (1 ng/L) in most samples.
VIMS continued monitoring TBT in water samples from nine locations in Hampton Creek and Sarah Creek, Virginia. This allows a comparison of TBT concentration trends in water from marina areas with trends determined for the Elizabeth River.
![]() |
![]() |
Water Column Monitoring: 18 Stations were selected for monitoring sites in the Elizabeth River and Hampton Roads (Figure). Environmental water samples are collected by VIMS personnel bimonthly at 18 E.R. station locations selected by the VADEQ. Sample custody issues are eliminated by utilizing the same analyze water samples. Once collected, all environmental samples are maintained in locked storage prior to analysis. All vessels used for collecting samples are free of TBT containing antifoulants and water samples are collected in sample storage containers to avoid cross contamination of samples via sampling gear. Samples are collected as near to high slack water as possible and the sampling information recorded on each container and in a field notebook. Water is collected from the top meter of the water column with care to exclude the surface microlayer. Sample bottles are rinsed twice with ambient water prior to collection of the sample. Field blanks were carried on each sampling trip and the samples are kept in the dark on ice in the field for transport back to the laboratory. To document sampling variability, duplicate 2 liter samples are collected at four stations during each sampling trip (>20% replication). Once returned to the laboratory the samples are preserved with HCL to below pH 2 and kept at 4oC in the dark in a locked cold room prior to analysis.
![]() |
Tributyltin analysis: Water samples are analyzed for butyltins by an adaptation of the methodology published earlier (Unger et al, 1986 ) which has been described in detail in a manual prepared for the Virginia DEQ (Unger, 1996). This is the same analytical method used in all previous TBT monitoring and assures comparability with historical data. Analysis of extraction blanks (>10%), sample duplicates (>10%), matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates document the accuracy and precision of these analyses to assure project data objectives are met. The method detection limit is 1 ng/L and has been determined using the procedures recommended by the DEQ and described in detail in the report “Elizabeth River TBT Monitoring Report on TBT Methodology Detection Limit, Precision and Linearity” (Figure).
Left: Scientist extracting TBT from Elizabeth River water samples
Click here for a pdf copy of the manual describing the analysis of butyltins in environmental samples.
Click here for a pdf copy of the TBT method validation report.
Link to:
ELIZABETH RIVER TRIBUTYLTIN
MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT: 1999-2006
Comparison of yearly TBT concentrations
Most current sampling results
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| June | February | January |
| August | April | March |
| October | June | May |
| November | August | July |
| October | October | |
| November | November |
Comparison with areas outside the Elizabeth River
Average concentrations for all monitoring stations over the 1999-2002 time
period are plotted and compared (Figure). Error bars illustrate one
standard deviation of the calculated mean concentration. Long-term monitoring
of marina stations by VIMS has shown that average TBT concentrations have been
reduced dramatically since legislation limiting TBT application was enacted in
the late 1980’s. The results of current monitoring shows that
many of the Elizabeth River and Hampton Roads monitoring stations now exceed
the average TBT concentrations measured in marina areas.
Key Points
| Virginia
Institute of Marine Science
Dr. Michael Unger |
VA Dept. of
Environmental Quality Roger K. Everton VA DEQ, Tidewater Regional Office 5636 Southern Blvd. Virginia Beach, VA 23462 Phone: 757-518-2150 Fax: 757-518-2003 |
Elizabeth
River Project
Joe Rieger |
This work has been funded by the Department of Environmental Quality Elizabeth River Monitoring Program
The following people have been instrumental in the collection and analysis
of samples from the Elizabeth River:
| Ellen Travelstead | Alex Jestel |
| Jimmy Greene | Gregory Mears |
| George Vadas | Dr. Drew Luellen |
Questions/comments regarding the design of this website should be directed to Gregory Mears.
(This page was last updated 05/16/2007 )